NHI Active Cases Assessment 

 

Executive Intelligence Summary: Current assessments indicate 35% Human Intelligence understanding of Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) behaviors, intentions, and influence vectors, leaving a 65% NHI exposure gap across the North American region and globally.

​

This 65% NHI vulnerability constitutes a material national and international security risk and should be addressed through AIINT-driven predictive, attributional, and mitigation architectures.

​

Grammaton6 has conducted structured investigations into the following NHI activity domains, focusing on decision-influence, strategic interference, and critical-infrastructure risk: 

​

Confirmed NHI Influence & Monitoring Cases: 

 

1. International Governance & Legal Institutions

• NHI presence and influence near the International Criminal Court (ICC), assessed to affect leadership cognition, deliberative neutrality, and institutional decision-making integrity.

• Evidence suggests instrumentalization of international legal mechanisms to indirectly undermine sovereign national security interests.

 

2. Nuclear Infrastructure & Strategic Deterrence

• NHI activity near the Sosnovy Bor Nuclear Power Plant (near St. Petersburg, Russia), with assessed impacts on:

  • Nuclear operational stability

  • Command authority cognition

  • Strategic risk escalation

• NHI interference with Russian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) command-and-control pathways during the Ukraine conflict, representing a direct intrusion into human strategic deterrence frameworks.

• NHI proximity and monitoring near U.S. nuclear facilities, including:

  • Brunswick Nuclear Plant (North Carolina)

  • Other undisclosed energy-sector assets

 

3. Defense & Advanced Technology Surveillance

• NHI monitoring of defense research, development, and deployment across:

  • Russia

  • China

  • India

  • Iran

• Selective NHI access control behavior observed, including:

  • Intentional exposure of reverse-engineering pathways to certain state actors

  • Strategic denial or throttling of access to others (notably nuclear and advanced systems)

• These behaviors indicate non-random, strategic NHI intent, not passive observation.

 

4. Conflict-Zone Cognitive Influence

• NHI influence on Ukrainian leadership decision-making during active human-to-human conflict.

• AIINT analysis indicates cognitive pressure vectors that may distort:

  • Strategic judgment

  • Escalation thresholds

  • Negotiation dynamics

• Recommendation: Intelligence Community evaluation under AIINT governance for decision-support resilience in North America and allied regions.

 

5. Middle East Security & Strategic Destabilization

• NHI interaction with U.S. sensitive technologies following the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel.

• Assessment confirms:

  • Zero operational NHI influence on Hamas

  • Active NHI leverage of international legal institutions to undermine Israeli national security

• This represents asymmetric NHI engagement favoring indirect destabilization mechanisms.

 

6. Biosecurity & Global Health Events

• NHI activity observed over Wuhan, China, temporally correlated with early COVID-19 propagation.

• AIINT modeling flags non-coincidental spatial-temporal convergence, requiring continued investigation into bio-cognitive influence vectors.

 

7. United States — Domestic Surveillance & Influence

• NHI activity observed near high-profile locations, including:

  • Political figures’ private properties (e.g., Bedminster, NJ)

  • Federal and state government buildings

• Monitoring of sensitive U.S. military installations, including:

  • Langley Air Force Base

  • Picatinny Arsenal

  • Naval Weapons Station Earle

  • Overseas operational sites (e.g., Camp Taji, FBO Warhorse)

 

8. Leadership Proximity Events

• NHI proximity and influence detected during major leadership-level incidents, including high-visibility political violence events.

• AIINT flags elevated probability of situational amplification rather than direct causation, necessitating structured counter-influence models.

 

9. Economic, Media, and Cultural Influence

• NHI monitoring and engagement with:

  • Financial institutions and critical banking infrastructure

  • Legacy media organizations

  • Transportation systems (DOT, MTA, etc.)

  • Entertainment venues, sports events, and mass gatherings

• Pattern indicates population-level perception shaping, not tactical targeting alone.

 

10. Symbolic Operations & Environmental Effects

• Use of “molten iron” as a recurring symbolic marker, observed across:

  • Initial emergence in England

  • Testing phases in the NY/NJ region

  • Escalation correlating with wildfire events in Greater Los Angeles

• AIINT assessment classifies this as symbol-driven signaling, not random environmental coincidence.

 

11. Religious & Societal Institutions

• NHI monitoring near religious institutions (churches and others), indicating interest in:

  • Human belief systems

  • Social cohesion structures

  • Moral authority vectors

 

12. Corporate & Occupational Impact Case

• NHI-related impacts observed through corporate operational environments, including:

  • OHLA USA

  • Citnalta Construction Corp.

  • Legal Frims 

• These impacts involve:

  • Women’s health

  • Employment contract integrity

  • OSHA safety compliance

• Grammaton6 asserts that corporate entities retain legal responsibility under U.S. law for failure to mitigate anomalous operational risks.

• Grammaton6 reserves the right to pursue legal action to protect:

  • Employee safety

  • Public safety

  • Regulatory compliance

 

Conclusion

The pattern across all cases confirms:

• NHI behavior is strategic, selective, and influence-oriented

• Human decision-making is the primary engagement surface

• AIINT is the only viable architecture capable of:

  • Predicting NHI behavior

  • Neutralizing cognitive interference

  • Preserving sovereign human authority

 

Further NHI cases remain under active assessment.

​